The Drug Enforcement Administration has published corrected transcripts from all 11 days of its marijuana rescheduling hearing. The public files cover proceedings held from June 29 through July 15 and replace the pending-publication status described in DEA's August 20 correction order. The release makes the hearing record available for review. It is not a final ruling on whether marijuana should move from Schedule I to Schedule III.
DEA's public proceeding page now links corrected transcripts for hearing days 1 through 11. The publication does not change marijuana's federal schedule, create a final agency decision or establish an effective date for Schedule III.
What DEA Published
DEA's public proceeding page now lists a separate transcript PDF for each hearing day. Day 1 begins with the June 29 opening session, while Day 11 records the July 15 closing day. Together, the files provide the public record of testimony, questioning and exhibits referenced during the proceeding.
The 13-page correction order covers all 11 days of hearings held from June 29 through July 15. It says proposed corrections were submitted by the federal government, Smart Approaches to Marijuana, three states opposing rescheduling, several individual or advocacy participants and the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation.
The judge adopted corrections for misspelled names, inaccurate speaker labels, mistranscribed words and other errors. Some changes are consequential to accurate reading, such as replacing “illegal” with “legal” in one passage and correcting references from Schedule III to Schedule I in two others. The order does not say those edits change testimony or add evidence. Its stated purpose is to correct the transcription of what was said.
The order required the public version to show corrections in red, mark deleted text with strikethroughs and redact personally identifiable information. DEA's publication means readers can now consult the corrected record directly instead of relying on preliminary daily copies or summaries.
Why the Transcript Matters
An administrative record is the evidence and argument an agency uses to reach and defend a decision. A clean transcript lets the judge, DEA officials, parties and any reviewing court see exactly what witnesses and attorneys said. The extensive correction list shows why readers should not treat an uncorrected daily transcript as the final record.
The corrections follow an August 17 deadline for proposed edits and optional post-hearing briefs. DEA's July 16 briefing order allowed each designated party to file one brief of up to 50 pages containing closing arguments, proposed findings of fact and proposed conclusions of law. Filing was optional.
Those filings are not a public vote or a binding outcome. They are arguments for the tribunal to consider alongside testimony and exhibits. CannaWize will review any briefs that DEA makes public and will separate each party's claims from findings the agency ultimately adopts.
What the Order Does Not Resolve
The correction order does not decide the central questions in the case. It does not announce whether DEA accepts the proposal to move marijuana to Schedule III, explain how the agency weighs the hearing evidence or provide a date for a final rule. The current legal schedule remains in place unless and until a final agency action changes it.
It also does not create nationwide marijuana legalization. Our Schedule III explainer details the potential research and tax consequences as well as the limits. State possession rules, state licensing systems, federal product approval and restrictions on interstate commerce remain separate legal issues.
What Happens Next
With the corrected transcript public, the administrative law judge can evaluate the testimony, exhibits and post-hearing arguments under DEA's hearing procedures. Neither the transcript page nor the correction order publishes a deadline for a recommended decision or final agency action.
Readers should watch for primary documents rather than treating a procedural deadline as a policy change. The key signals would include a recommended decision, another scheduling order or a final rule with a stated effective date. Until one of those documents changes the status, the proposal remains pending.
What This Means for Texas
Nothing in the transcript order changes Texas law today. Texas patients remain governed by the state's Compassionate Use Program, while hemp businesses and consumers face separate state and federal definitions. See our reporting on the Texas delta-8 schedule and our guide to the gap between federal and state cannabis law before applying a federal headline to a Texas purchase or prescription.
For businesses, the most discussed possible Schedule III consequence is federal tax treatment under Internal Revenue Code Section 280E. That consequence depends on an actual schedule change, not on the hearing transcript being corrected. Planning should distinguish a pending proposal from an effective rule.
The Bottom Line
DEA has published the corrected record for all 11 days of the marijuana rescheduling hearing. That makes the proceeding easier to review and moves it past another administrative checkpoint. It does not settle rescheduling, legalize marijuana or change the rules that apply today.